From the Westerly Sun – h/t Dorothy
Two committees, different entities
IT STANDS TO REASON THAT THE CHARIHO Regional School Committee and the Chariho Building Committee are different entities. Beyond the most obvious difference — their names — they have distinct memberships and roles.
So, it would seem, they are different entities before the law.
Now, it is true that the two committees serve the same public and share many goals, such as turning the tri-town district’s $20.5million capital projects into reality. But when you move in the realm of public office — or multi-million dollar projects — there’s no such thing as making too certain your legal ground is secure.
In legal matters, both panels turn to Edwards, Angell, Palmer and Dodge, a Providence law firm. On a simple level, that makes perfect sense. If the firm is good enough to represent school officials, why not represent school building officials?
That argument faltered when the school committee was told by Attorney Jon M. Anderson that he couldn’t offer a legal opinion on an issue because it regarded another client — the building panel.
[Editor's Note] – Jon Anderson is the attorney who told the Chariho School committee that I couldn’t serve on both the SC and Town Council because of “conflicts of interest.”
The very idea angered Andrew J. Polouski, a member of the school committee, who said that the primary function of the firm is to serve the elected board, and that the building committee should have hired another firm.
Admittedly, it seems on the face of things that such a relationship might be the most efficient course of action, but in this scenario we’re also talking about a $20 million project and that has to take precedence over potential savings of a fraction of that cost.
We find it odd that the law firm didn’t at least raise the issue of a possible conflict by serving both boards, however remote it might have appeared at the start. Nevertheless, the local boards have a responsibility for considering potential or perceived conflicts of interest in this kind of scenario as well.
It’s been tough enough for the school district to pass a bond in the first place; we hate to see preventable technical dilemmas get in the way of implementing the bond.
While the two panels are certainly on the same side, as School Committee member Terri Serra noted, perhaps this bump in the road can serve as a caution sign to be on the look out for any other potential issues as this exciting project takes shape.
___________________________________
Chariho continues to embarrass itself …