Chariho School Parents’ Forum

March 26, 2007

A Math Warning from the Past

Filed under: Chariho,State-wide,Student Performance — Editor @ 2:27 pm

The current debate over Chariho’s math curriculum is not “new or news.”  The following letter was published in the Providence Journal in 2000.  h/t Curious Resident

Making Education Fun, Creative – And Impossible

The Providence Journal, Sep 23, 2000
Op-ed by Stephen M. Hollister

I would like to comment on the Sept. 17 article by Julia Steiny in the Education & Employment section (“Math comes alive in Clayville“).

She discussed the use of a new method of teaching math, called “Investigations,” by Clayville Elementary School in Scituate. Investigations is one of the new ways of teaching mathematics that changes the role of the teacher to that of facilitator. It also eliminates the tedious rote memorization of basic facts — “drill and kill.”

I think that this is such a good idea that it should be applied to other difficult tasks, like learning to play the piano. Just think, no more tedious scales to practice and you can figure out for yourself how to hold your hands and position your fingers.

You know, there is more than one way to solve a problem. Everyone should decide what works best for himself or herself.

You would also have groups of two or more taking lessons at the same time.

The teacher would pass out the music and the students would decide on the best approach to keeping time and to playing the notes. They would make an oral and written presentation about their solution and be critiqued by other student groups. The students would have portfolios to keep track of their best work.

Of course, the students would have to be able to play the music, but there would be no more nerve-wracking recitals. Instead, the students would tape their best attempt at the music at home and then make oral presentations to the parents and then play their tapes.

Grading could be done using a rubric that takes into account all aspects: attitude, problem solving, oral and written presentation, and, oh yes, playing. Playing the piano should not be something for just the elite few who can adapt to the traditional approach to teaching piano. If piano teaching and learning is fun and creative, then there will be more people in the world who can say; “I like the piano!”

If this sounds ludicrous to you, then you should worry about what schools are foisting on your children in the name of improved math education. With very little oversight and very few (self-serving) studies being done, schools are using your children as guinea pigs for these new educational theories.

These changes are not trivial. They constitute a complete reversal in their approach to teaching: student-group centered, rather than teacher centered, and a top-down approach to teaching material, rather than a bottom-up approach that focuses on fundamental, basic skills. At the very least, this is a high risk change to teaching and you have no choice in the matter.

These programs may increase the number of students who say that they like math, but they will decrease the number of students who will be prepared to tackle the difficulties of algebra, trigonometry, and calculus.

STEPHEN M. HOLLISTER
Jamestown

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. Who or WHAT provides the testing and licensure for the employees for the Psychological Center hired by CHARIHO? Is this a proprietary outfit that certifies/licenses their own>

    If the published cost per student published is correct, and is the sot to the taxpayers for the RYSE program, how much ADDITIONAL money is acquired from health insurance, Medicaid, and Medicare for the RYSE students?

    WHY do we have a proprietary system for providing this care for our children?

    What are the ACTUAL costs, per student for the RYSE program? We see the “costs per student” for taxpayers, but I want to see how much is charged to other funding streams.

    WHERE are the studies that show we are getting the most “bang for the buck”??

    Since this is an illegal school (in MY opinion), is the school committee able to cancel the contract when the bond is defeated?

    How can we shut this whole process DOWN, NOW??? Since this is an illegal venture, bypassing the bidding process, we should have a legal framework to build on to remove this whole setup from our system.

    If CHARIHO got back on track and focused on EDUCATION, NOT mental health, not physical health, but rather basic and advanced education with an expectation for accountability, perhaps we would have a stronger educational system, better students, and higher testing scores. Rather then expecting mediocrity, lets expect excellence and treat ALL students with an expectation of excellence. Leave the mental health to the expert sites instead of trying to develop our own with a proprietary system, let the PATENTS take responsibility for the physical and mental health of their children and get back to education.

    Comment by Georgies Mom — May 23, 2007 @ 5:44 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: