PC Inc Original Proposal

 There is no date on this document (there was no date on the “Scientific and Conceptual Rationale” sheet either), but the words “original document” was written on the top of the first page. 

Note on page 2 how it is again acknowledged that MST has not been used in schools before.  Again, I ask, if the research for MST does not apply to our population, why use that research as the “primary” criteria for selecting a $420k contract rather than a $276k contract?